Standard Podcast [ 17:26 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Links Mentioned During Show

Menu Meter

In The Trenches Podcast

Iterm (Terminal Program)

iTerm FAQ

Migration Assitant

Spotlight

One of the most annoying aspects of iTunes as a Podcast aggregator was it’s “Auto Delete” Feature for podcast.

If you had not listened to a show after five days, it would simply delete that show.

Well I sure as heck don’t have time to constantly be caught up on 30 to 40 podcast, therefore I found this feature annoying at best.

Happy to report that as of iTunes version 6.02, this has been fixed. As usual Apple listens to their users and has now added a “Do Not Auto Delete” menu.

To use it just go to the podcast sections of your iTunes, highlight the podcast you want, right click and in the contextual menu select “Do Not Auto Delete.”

Enjoy
Victor

After talking about the rumor a while back, I today found a story on TUAW about a technology I am very excited about. Best of all; Apple are filing for the patent.

It occurred to me that while the iSight in the MacBook Pro was very “cool” and inevitable; it was quite frankly…. ugly. It needed some work because while it was incredibly small, it didn’t do much for the look of the product overall. Having that small black dot there (almost as bad as the IR sensor) threw the display off center of the frame which was very unbalanced and not at all aesthetic.

It looks like the technology to solve this issue, and many more, may well be coming to a Mac near you soon. Apple have filed for a patent that would enable them to effectively double the amount of pixels on a display, however; every other pixel would in fact be a miniature camera. That would give the screen both input and output capabilities. In effect, the screen would see you as you see it. Kids are smarter than us after all.

Apples “Integrated Sensing Display” Patent

This technology would mean that we no longer need web-cams, we no longer need “built-in iSights” and we no longer have to have off center displays. This would also mean that you are actually looking into the eyes of a person you are video conferencing with as opposed to at the screen and you each seeing the others forehead and eyelids. Of course, it doesn’t end there. It would almost certainly bring a clarity and resolution unmatched by traditional web-cams and be much lighter also.

What about the downsides? Well, I am sure many of you are thinking about being “filmed” while going about your business and the like, but it just doesn’t work that way. I am sure there would be people writing malware for these changes, but I doubt anything would get very widespread before being crushed. It would, I should imagine, higher the cost of the displays and thus the Mac overall, but as it becomes more widespread, it will certainly become less costly as is always the case. I am confident that Apple would make best use of this and bring potential that we haven’t even thought of yet.

I for one am very excited and can’t wait to see the benefits brought to life in a year or two.

It’s been a long standing wish of the tech community that those forced into using Windows at work and their choice operating system at home could one day use the same computer for both. For years the question has been asked; when will be be able to natively dual boot Windows and Mac OS?

Well, today the answer is worth over $6,000. Colin from Delicious Monster and Uneasy Silence which means the total prize fund currently stands at a whopping $6,702!

For those who have no idea what I am talking about, Macs have used PowerPC processors for years, and with the birth of the first Intel powered Macs this month there has been discussion of making your Mac able to boot either Mac OS X or Windows XP at will. This has been made theoretically possible, but with clauses of the Basic Input Output System (or BIOS) being different on new Intel Macs, support of this through some new Intel motherboards and lack of drivers for such an event. It’s been a debate that has raged in the land of the tech this month more than ever, and finally someone has laid down money to find the answer.

If you think you can do it, or you have already found the mysterious answer, then please visit WinXPonMac and claim your prize. Good luck to all entrants and power to the geeks!

If you want to donate to the cause then please send via PayPal to this address.

You get up in the morning, you shove in your earphones and fall into the car looking like something from a science book. You hit play on your “Morning Call Playlist” and you are able to make it the 15 feet in your car to the nearest Starbucks. You buy your “Short decaf cap” or “Tall mocha latte” or “Grande low-fat regular”, wake up and then…

Your mind switches on, your senses actually become aware of more than the sweet smell of coffee in the morning and you realize you have listened to this same playlist on the way to work for 671 working days in a row. You need more music. What do you do? Head home, log onto your computer and apologize for being late? Head to the office and call the tech. guy to unblock iTunes? Pass out?

This is where Starbucks plans on solving your problems for you:

A lot of our customers are asking for [music] device fill-up, and going forward we’ll do that

said Ken Lombard, president of Starbucks Entertainment, at the Midem music industry conference in Cannes.

The obvious music device would be the incredibly popular iPod using the market share leading iTunes Music Store. There is no date set yet, but it’s expected sometime in 2006 or 2007. Filling up your iPod at Starbucks, what next? At gas stations?

Standard Podcast [ 17:58 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Show Notes
Evo Terra and the Dragon Page

Activity Monitor for the Mac

The Dock

George Starcher and Personal e-mail certificates

Thawte.com for digital e-mail certificates

Terminal Tips (Unix and Darwin)

Wikipedia definition of Unix

OS X based on Unix

OS X Terminal Commands (be careful and use at your own risk)

John Chambers and the One Minute Tip

One Minute Tip Podcast and John Chambers

An interesting article caught my eye earlier today from CNet. It was all about how iPod hard disk drives write the entire drive before overwriting it and that has lead to several criminal investigations due to the iPods ability to store contact information and not actually loose it.

How does this refer to Macs? Well, I assure you this isn’t going to turn into an iPod binge, but it certainly relates to Macs. There is in essence a list of files the operating system (Mac OS X and previous) can access buried in your operating system files. As with Windows file systems, when you delete a file from your Mac the filename is simply deleted from this list, but the file remains. This does not cause inaccurate readouts of disk space, but it does pose a potential security risk.

When you delete files from the trash, you can either “Empty Trash” or “Secure Empty Trash” from the Finder menu. If you “Secure Empty Trash” then you are overwriting that file data with zeros (nothingness). Secure? Not yet. This only overwrites the file once and it can still be accessed by an expert.

If you really want to be secure with deleted files then you can address the issue much more securely by once again accessing the Disk Utility application either from the Finder window, under Applications>Utilities or by simply doing a Spotlight search for the term “Disk Utility”. Once the application is open, choose the hard disk drive you want to secure from the list on the left and then choose the tab “Erase”. Don’t panic.

Next you will want to Erase Free Space… and then choose the number of passes you wish to make. The more passes you do, the more securely and permanently deleted your files will be, but the longer it will take. In addition, you will find that more available disk space (as listed at the bottom of the window) the longer the process can take; and it can take a long time.

You will not loose any un-deleted data during this process. That said; if you really want to secure your unwanted data (such as when you come to sell you Mac or otherwise destroy your Hard Disk Drive, you don’t want to just hit it or “Zero” it; you will have to take a drill to it (and replace as necessary). This is a little over the top for the typical user, but if you have financial information stored on your drive or something similar, it’s an option worth taking when you come to upgrade (after transferring the data you want to keep, obviously).

[Inspiring Article from CNet.com]

Over the past months there have been a lot of discussions over Apples new iPod connectivity and more recently the Intel based Macs connectivity. So this bows down to USB vs. FireWire then… Well, let’s “corner ‘em up”.

The origins of the USB (Universal Serial Bus) interface is complicated; so let’s start this article by looking at it and simplifying. Originally, there were two ways of the USB hardware to interface with the software which were both HCIs (Host Controller Interfaces). Compaq made the OHCI (Open) and Intel made the UHCI (Universal). Sadly, there was a battle and that forced hardware manufacturers to test on both systems.

Intel won the battle. Intel were more processor intensive than Compaq in this model because they were more software driven. This was not so great, but then… Intel make the CPUs. Of course, it meant that it worked out cheaper to make UHCI devices than OHCI. Overall, this was good for Intel because people would invest in the cheaper technology which pushed for faster and faster processors; something Intel was delivering.

So what about FireWire? FireWire (or IEEE 1394) is an Apple technology. Technically it is slower than USB2.0, however it is more expensive to manufacture because it’s more hardware based. FireWire 800 is faster than USB 2.0 (significantly with large amounts of data) and far more established in the industry for just this reason. It’s commonly used for video camera connectivity and other media based products; a field that Apple specializes in. The important note is that it is faster than USB 2.0 only because it does not fluctuate in transfer rate like the technically faster USB 2.0 does.

There is a twist to the tail though. Intel significantly aided in the design of FireWire 800. There was a falling out of Steve Jobs and the Intel camp over a Job’s proposal of a $1/port licensing fee. Intel used this as a reason to drop FireWire and create USB 2.0 instead. This is interesting when taken into account over the new “move” of Apple dropping FireWire and incorporating USB 2.0.

Perhaps this is a backlash of this argument, dating back to 1993? As everyone knows, PCs are more commonly associated with USB than FireWire, even if it’s an inferior product. Intel are moving in a direction that will please the majority of non-technical people however; they are adapting USB to be wireless, where FireWire is currently static and if anything heading for speed instead of “wirelessness”. Why would you want faster when you can have wireless right?

Draw your own conclusions, but to me it looks like Mac is heading in the direction of switchers and the non-tech minded… perhaps this is a big deal, but is it a big change?

Standard Podcast [ 16:39 ] Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Show Notes
Using the Sidebar
Mac OS X Keyboard Shortcuts
Photocasting and publishing articles for subscribers
Other Sites Mentioned
Bell’s in the Batfry
In The Trenches