<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macworld 2008 Videos: Data Robotics Drobo Share</title>
	<atom:link href="http://typicalmacuser.com/wordpress/2008/01/23/macworld-2008-videos-data-robotics-drobo-share/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://typicalmacuser.com/wordpress/2008/01/23/macworld-2008-videos-data-robotics-drobo-share/</link>
	<description>Help for the Switcher and New Apple Macintosh User</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Paxton</title>
		<link>http://typicalmacuser.com/wordpress/2008/01/23/macworld-2008-videos-data-robotics-drobo-share/comment-page-1/#comment-22001</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Paxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typicalmacuser.com/wordpress/2008/01/23/macworld-2008-videos-data-robotics-drobo-share/#comment-22001</guid>
		<description>Hey Victor, thanks for bringing us news from MacWorld, I really enjoyed it!rnrnThe DroboShare looks interesting.  I do have one concern.  If you get a chance to test one, could you compare data throughput with a standard USB model?  To me, even if it has a gigabit connection, it&#039;s still limited by the weakest link in the chain, that being the USB connection.  I can understand the convenience factor, but not any improvement in data transfer.rnrnThanks!rnTed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Victor, thanks for bringing us news from MacWorld, I really enjoyed it!rnrnThe DroboShare looks interesting.  I do have one concern.  If you get a chance to test one, could you compare data throughput with a standard USB model?  To me, even if it has a gigabit connection, it&#8217;s still limited by the weakest link in the chain, that being the USB connection.  I can understand the convenience factor, but not any improvement in data transfer.rnrnThanks!rnTed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Paxton</title>
		<link>http://typicalmacuser.com/wordpress/2008/01/23/macworld-2008-videos-data-robotics-drobo-share/comment-page-1/#comment-18433</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Paxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://typicalmacuser.com/wordpress/2008/01/23/macworld-2008-videos-data-robotics-drobo-share/#comment-18433</guid>
		<description>Hey Victor, thanks for bringing us news from MacWorld, I really enjoyed it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The DroboShare looks interesting.  I do have one concern.  If you get a chance to test one, could you compare data throughput with a standard USB model?  To me, even if it has a gigabit connection, it&#039;s still limited by the weakest link in the chain, that being the USB connection.  I can understand the convenience factor, but not any improvement in data transfer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!&lt;br&gt;Ted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Victor, thanks for bringing us news from MacWorld, I really enjoyed it!</p>
<p>The DroboShare looks interesting.  I do have one concern.  If you get a chance to test one, could you compare data throughput with a standard USB model?  To me, even if it has a gigabit connection, it&#39;s still limited by the weakest link in the chain, that being the USB connection.  I can understand the convenience factor, but not any improvement in data transfer.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />Ted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

